books

It is hard to read "The Machine Stops" today without doing a double-take at the publication date. E.M. Forster wrote this novella in 1909, in the same authorial decade that gave us "A Room with a View" and "Howards End", and yet the world he conjures - underground hexagonal cells, video calls between disinterested loved ones, instant on-demand entertainment, a creeping suspicion of in-person contact - reads less like Edwardian speculation than like a status report on the last five years. The text is so eerily of-the-moment that the temptation is to mistake recognition for praise. It deserves more careful handling than that.

The premise is straightforward. Humanity has retreated underground after rendering the surface uninhabitable, and each person now lives alone in a small cell where every need is provided by the Machine: food, music, conversation, ventilation, a soft and sourceless light. Vashti, a placid middle-aged lecturer, is perfectly content to spend her days disseminating second-hand ideas to thousands of equally housebound correspondents. Her son Kuno, dragged into the world with the heretical curse of a muscular body, is not content. He calls her, on a screen naturally, to tell her he has been to the surface, and what he saw there. From this small filial friction Forster builds, with extraordinary economy, the collapse of a civilisation.

What is most impressive on the page is the prose itself. Forster's sentences here are stripped of the lush comfort of his society novels. They are clipped, exact and dry, with the air of a slightly bemused field report. The opening image of the bee-cell room has been quoted so often it risks becoming wallpaper, but the discipline of it bears re-reading: a writer in 1909 deciding that the way to render a futuristic dwelling is to describe it as if it were already perfectly ordinary. That tonal restraint is what gives the political content its bite. Forster does not need to editorialise about the dangers of mediated experience, because his narrator simply reports, without alarm, that the population has come to prefer information that has been handled by at least ten other minds before it reaches them.

The story's central arguments are unusually durable. The worship of a technology nobody understands, the slow tolerance of small failures until catastrophic failure feels normal, the equation of physical weakness with civilisational advancement, the deletion of children whose bodies suggest they might one day need the surface - these ideas have lost none of their force, and in some cases have sharpened. The novella is often framed as a counterblast to H.G. Wells's brighter visions of mechanised futures, and that frame is useful, because it reminds us that Forster is not predicting; he is arguing. The Machine is not a forecast but a thought experiment about what humans, given the option, will let themselves become.

That said, it would be dishonest to recommend the book without admitting its limits. The characters are thin. Vashti is a vessel for complacency and Kuno is a vessel for revolt, and they are not asked to be much more than that. The decision to confine the narrative almost entirely to Vashti's point of view is defensible thematically, since the reader is meant to feel the claustrophobia of the cell, but it does mean that Kuno's most important act, his ascent to the surface, arrives as second-hand reportage in a long monologue - exactly the kind of relayed experience the story otherwise rebukes. The allegorical machinery, too, occasionally clanks. By the closing pages, when prayer is being directed to the Machine itself and the system is failing in biblical stages, the symbolic temperature runs high enough that the human texture thins.

None of this materially diminishes the achievement. "The Machine Stops" is a short, severe, intellectually generous piece of writing that has earned every wave of rediscovery it has had, including the most recent one. It is worth reading without the lockdown filter, too, because the case it makes is broader than any single technological moment: that direct contact with the world, with weather, with strangers, with one's own physical limits, is not an inconvenience to be engineered around but the substance of being human. Forster knew this in 1909. The novella's quiet, lasting trick is to make us suspect that we are only now catching up to him.