books

Few crime novels of the twentieth century have aged as well as Patricia Highsmith's 1955 portrait of a young man with no conscience and considerable charm. The premise is almost embarrassingly simple. Tom Ripley, a small-time con artist drifting through Manhattan, is mistaken by a wealthy shipbuilder for a close friend of his wayward son, and is dispatched to Italy with expenses paid to coax the boy home. Dickie Greenleaf has no intention of coming home, and Tom, once installed in the sun-drenched expatriate idyll of Mongibello, has no intention of leaving it. What follows is not a whodunit but something more unsettling: a study of a man who decides that the easiest way to keep a life he was only visiting is to take it.

What makes the book extraordinary is the position it forces on you. Tom is a liar, a sponger, and eventually a murderer twice over, and yet the prose pulls you so deeply into his interior that you find yourself willing him to slip the noose. This is the novel's great subversive trick, and Highsmith executes it without ever once pleading his case. She never editorializes, never softens him with a tragic backstory delivered on cue. She simply records his thinking with such cold, patient clarity that complicity arrives before you have noticed it forming. By the time Tom is forging signatures and shuttling between two identities, you are no longer reading about a criminal; you are inside the logistics of his survival, holding your breath at each near miss.

The pacing rewards this approach. The long opening movement, before any blood is spilled, is deliberately unhurried, and some readers will find the early going slow precisely because there is no one to root for. Dickie is a spoiled and faithless playboy, Marge an irritant the men barely tolerate, and Tom himself a self-pitying opportunist before he becomes anything worse. But the patience is the point. Highsmith is laying the psychological foundation so carefully that when the violence comes it feels less like a plot turn than the inevitable expression of everything established before it. From that moment the tension never slackens, and her control over when to tighten and when to release is the work of a writer in complete command of the form.

The atmosphere deserves particular praise. The Italian coast, the boozy lunches, the cafes and the train compartments and the rented rooms are rendered with such sensory precision that the book carries a genuine sense of place rare in the genre. There is real beauty here, and the contrast between the gorgeous setting and the rot at the centre of it gives the whole thing its peculiar charge. The style is spare and unshowy, every word doing its work, but in key passages it can turn suddenly explosive.

Not everything holds together under scrutiny. The plausibility strains in places, most notably in the long cat-and-mouse sequence with the Italian police, where a detective who interviewed Tom at length while he was impersonating Dickie somehow fails to recognise him weeks later. It is the kind of convenience the genre often demands, but it sits awkwardly in a book otherwise so rigorous about the mechanics of deception, and attentive readers will feel the seam. There is also a streak of misogyny that recurs across Highsmith's work and surfaces here in the treatment of Marge, who exists largely as an obstacle to be managed rather than a person in her own right.

Then there is the question of what lies beneath Tom's fixation on Dickie. The novel hums with a low-frequency homoerotic energy that Highsmith handles with more sympathy than the period might lead you to expect, even as the text frames Tom's desires with an uneasiness that reads, at this distance, as its own form of judgment. Whether one sees this as evasion or as honest period texture will depend on the reader, but it is undeniably part of what makes the character so hard to pin down. Tom is a blank canvas onto which fear, longing, and ambition are projected in turn, and the refusal to resolve him is a feature rather than a flaw.

What endures is the chill of recognition. Stripped of the romantic gloss later adaptations would apply, the Tom Ripley of the page is an emotionally hollow man for whom identity is purely performance, something put on and taken off with a change of clothes. That idea, that the self is a thing you can simply act, feels more contemporary now than it can have done in 1955. The book remains a near-perfect piece of suspense, and a far more disquieting one than its reputation as elegant entertainment suggests.