books

Charles Frazier's second novel arrived nearly a decade after Cold Mountain swept the National Book Award and sold by the truckload, and it carried the weight of that success like a yoke. The reported eight-million-dollar advance hangs over the whole enterprise, an inconvenient fact that no amount of fog-wrapped scenery quite manages to dispel. The question is not whether Thirteen Moons is a beautiful book. It often is. The question is whether beauty, spread thin across a century of one man's life, is enough to sustain a novel. The answer turns out to be a frustrating "almost."

The story follows Will Cooper, orphaned at twelve and dispatched into the wilderness with a horse, a key, and a map, bound to run a remote trading post at the edge of the Cherokee Nation. There he finds a father in the chief Bear, becomes an adopted son of a people not his own, and spends the rest of his long life as their advocate, lawyer, and eventually something like a surrogate chief. Will is loosely modeled on the historical William Holland Thomas, the white attorney who fought for Cherokee land rights and raised Confederate companies from among them, though Frazier insists on the novel's complete invention while winking that the two men "share some DNA." That coyness is its own small irritation. It practically dares you to look up the real history, and the looking only underscores how much richer the documented life can feel than its fictional shadow.

What works here works very well. Frazier remains a genuinely gifted chronicler of place and period. His Appalachia is rendered with a precision that borders on the devotional, every river, cove, and snowfall lovingly catalogued, and his portrait of a raw, half-built Washington City crackles with energy. The novel is at its strongest when it widens its lens beyond Will entirely, using one man's vantage to capture a country lurching out of the frontier and into an age of telephones, automobiles, and encroaching railways. The historical texture is impeccable. So too is the early stretch of the book, where the young Will ventures alone into unmapped country and stumbles into first love. There is real momentum in those pages, a sense of discovery and danger and appetite. The food alone is worth the price of admission. Few writers can make a campfire meal feel so vivid you want to eat it off the page.

The Cherokee material complicates the easy story of "ignorant savages" in ways that feel both honest and overdue. Many of these people had long since taken up farming, intermarried, and owned land. The novel does the worthwhile work of restoring that complexity, and the chapters tracking the dissolution of the Nation and the brutality of removal land with a force that is genuinely disturbing in the best sense. This is a book that puts a human face on the Trail of Tears.

And yet. Somewhere around the three-quarter mark, the engine begins to stall. The episodic structure that felt expansive in the early going turns slack, and the later chapters simply lack the charge of those opening adventures. One could argue this mirrors the shape of a life, that the epiphanies of youth are never equalled as we settle into the dullness of age, and there is something to that defense. But it does not make for compelling reading. Frazier might have done better to narrow his focus to the love story and the years among the Cherokee, or to give the back half the weight it never quite earns.

The romance is the deepest disappointment. Claire is meant to be Will's lifelong muse and passion, the scarlet thread running through everything, but she remains maddeningly inscrutable, her behavior erratic enough that her hold on him never fully convinces. Their reunions should ache; too often they merely puzzle. The pacing problem extends throughout. A duel and a plate of fried cornmeal mush are granted roughly equal emotional weight, and the elderly narrator's tendency toward soft, Albom-flavored profundities about desire and time can curdle into sentiment.

So where does that leave us? Thirteen Moons is a flawed, beautiful, overlong novel that never escapes the shadow of its predecessor and never entirely justifies its own sprawl. If you share Frazier's elegiac romanticism, his reverence for vanished landscapes and lost ways of life, you will find a great deal to love. If you do not, the slow mule may test your patience. It is not Cold Mountain, and it knows it. But for the prose, the period detail, and that incandescent first half, it earns its place on the shelf, somewhere just below the masterpiece it so clearly wished to be.